🤖

AGIBOT Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. AgiBot A2vsApptronik Apollo

Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. AgiBot A2 and Apptronik Apollo: specs, price, use cases and SDKs.

Specifications

SpecAgiBot A2Apollo
Price (USD)
$100,000
$120,000
Category
humanoid
humanoid
Payload
15 kg
25 kg
Runtime
2 h
4 h
Speed
1.2 m/s
Weight
69 kg
73 kg
Degrees of Freedom
40
Battery
700 Wh
Shared use cases
No shared use cases
Only on AgiBot A2
  • Customer service
  • Reception
  • Exhibition presentations
  • Marketing
  • Manufacturing assistance
  • Logistics sorting
  • Security patrols
  • Data collection
  • Research applications
  • Autonomous manipulation and pick-and-place
  • Industrial assembly and quality inspection
  • Autonomous indoor navigation
  • Material movement
  • Workpiece loading
  • Pallet transport
  • Vibratory feeder loading
  • Retail brand activation
  • Research and education
  • Entertainment and broadcast media
Only on Apollo
  • Logistics
  • Manufacturing
  • Warehousing

When to pick which

When to pick AgiBot A2

Choose the AGIBOT Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. AgiBot A2 for retail brand activations, hospitality reception, or academic research environments where high dexterity and software customization are essential. With 40 degrees of freedom and a specialized SDK suite including Genie Sim 3.0 and LinkCraft, this robot excels in complex manipulation and interactive tasks. At a $100,000 price point, it offers a $20,000 savings over the Apollo, making it the superior choice for budget-conscious deployments in light industrial assembly or service sectors where the 15kg payload capacity meets operational requirements.

When to pick Apollo

Select the Apptronik Apollo for industrial warehousing and heavy-duty logistics operations that prioritize physical throughput and operational uptime. Its 25kg payload capacity is significantly higher than the AgiBot A2, enabling the handling of heavier containers and materials common in manufacturing environments. The 4-hour runtime is a decisive factor for facility managers seeking to minimize charging interruptions during long shifts. Additionally, the native ROS2 support ensures seamless integration for engineering teams already utilizing industry-standard middleware for fleet management, making it the more robust choice for large-scale brownfield automation projects.

AI-generated buyer guidance based on public specs.

Ready to evaluate?

Request a vendor quote or compare more options.